Angelo v. Kerik
Opinion of the Court
—Determination of respon
No basis exists to disturb the credibility findings of the Hearing Officer (see Matter ofBerenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]), and the penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness (see Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001]). We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.