O'Leary v. Noutsis
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Heinz v. Faljean (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Dominguez v. Carioscia (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Kaplinsky v. Mazor (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
A defendant seeking to vacate a default in appearing or answering must demonstrate a justifiable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Gray v B.R. Trucking Co., 59 NY2d 649, 650 [1983]; Cilindrello v Rayabin, 297 AD2d 699 [2002]; cf. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v Arthur Andersen & Co., 60 NY2d 693, 695 [1983]). The appellant failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for his default or a meritorious defense (see State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Bongiorno, 237 AD2d 31, 35 [1997]; Moore v Claudio, 224 AD2d 502, 503 [1996]; Passalacqua v Banat, 103 AD2d 769 [1984]). Thus, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the relief requested by the appellant. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, McGinity, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.