O'Leary v. Noutsis
Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
A defendant seeking to vacate a default in appearing or answering must demonstrate a justifiable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Gray v B.R. Trucking Co., 59 NY2d 649, 650 [1983]; Cilindrello v Rayabin, 297 AD2d 699 [2002]; cf. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v Arthur Andersen & Co., 60 NY2d 693, 695 [1983]). The appellant failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for his default or a meritorious defense (see State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Bongiorno, 237 AD2d 31, 35 [1997]; Moore v Claudio, 224 AD2d 502, 503 [1996]; Passalacqua v Banat, 103 AD2d 769 [1984]). Thus, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the relief requested by the appellant. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, McGinity, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.