DeLuise v. DeLuise
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (LaTia Martin, J.), entered on or about May 30, 2001,
The challenged modification in maintenance reflects a proper balancing of plaintiff’s substantial change in circumstances due to deteriorating health and defendant’s ability to pay for plaintiffs new needs (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]), and is otherwise substantially supported by the record (see Golden v Golden, 228 AD2d 184 [1996]). Plaintiffs contempt motion was properly denied based upon credible evidence of defendant’s inability to pay his original maintenance obligation due to college tuition expenses. We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.