People v. Anonymous
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme
Under the terms of defendant’s cooperation agreement and appeal waiver, the only issue properly before this Court is whether the People acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in determining whether defendant qualified for lenient treatment. Defendant waived a judicial determination of any factual issues concerning his compliance or noncompliance with the agreement (see People v Johnson, 291 AD2d 245 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 677 [2002]; People v Anonymous, 265 AD2d 200 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 916 [2000]). The People’s determination that defendant breached the agreement by failing to maintain contact with the police was made in good faith and was not arbitrary or capricious. For the same reasons, the court properly denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lemer and Gonzalez, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.