Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003

People v. Perry

People v. Perry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 20, 2003
305 A.D.2d 274; 759 N.Y.S.2d 320; 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5703
People v. Perry

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered December 21, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of JVa to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

While the prosecutor’s extensive questioning of defendant about drugs violated the trial court’s Sandoval ruling, the error was harmless (see People v Ayala, 75 NY2d 422, 431 [1990]).

Defendant’s double jeopardy claim concerning his conviction of both criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school *275grounds and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree is unpreserved (People v Gonzalez, 99 NY2d 76 [2002]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find no violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy (see Missouri v Hunter, 459 US 359, 366-369 [1983]). We decline to invoke our interest of justice jurisdiction to dismiss the noninclusory concurrent count (see People v Spence, 290 AD2d 223 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 641 [2002]; People v Kulakov, 278 AD2d 519 [2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 785 [2001]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.