Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003

In re Brandon S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 19, 2003

305 A.D.2d 609; 759 N.Y.S.2d 370

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Nicholas R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
Matter of Sara BB. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
In re Alex Z. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
In re David H. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
In re Jahmanni A. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
In re Nathaniel P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
In re Joseph R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
In re Sean R.P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
In re Briana J. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
In re Jeffrey McG. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
In re Mary Veronica R. Suffolk County Department of Social Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
In re Ricky A. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
In re Joseph G. (NYC Family Court 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), entered February 14, 2002, which, upon a fact-finding determination, dated January 3, 2002, that upon the admission of Brandon S. that he violated the conditions of a term of probation imposed by an order of disposition of the same court dated January 30, 2001, adjudicating him to be a person in need of supervision, vacated the term of probation and committed the appellant to the care and custody of the Dutchess County Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as committed the appellant to the care and custody of the Dutchess County Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

*610The appeal from so much of the order of disposition as committed the appellant to the care and custody of the Dutchess County Commissioner of Social Services for one year must be dismissed as academic because the placement period has expired (see Matter of Neftaly R., 283 AD2d 579, 580 [2001]).

The appellant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that his allocution was defective since he did not move to withdraw his admission on the grounds now asserted (see Family Ct Act § 321.4; CPL 220.60; People v Crowell, 273 AD2d 321 [2000]; People v McCoy, 270 AD2d 432 [2000]; cf. Matter of Anthony S., 302 AD2d 531 [2003]). We decline to review the appellant’s contention in the interest of justice. Feuerstein, J.P., McGinity, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.