Zizza v. Zizza
Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme
In this matrimonial action concerning the amount and tax consequences of plaintiff’s pendente lite maintenance award, defendant’s motion to reargue should have been denied. Although plaintiff originally asked for $11,000 monthly in nontaxable pendente lite maintenance and $6,000 monthly in pendente lite child support, for which she was ineligible because the parties continued to live together with their three sons, Justice Fields’s award of $17,000 in monthly maintenance preserved the status quo of the parties’ prior voluntary financial arrangement and took into account childcare and other expenses which are paid by plaintiff from her monthly allowance. Taking these factors into consideration, the pendente lite relief awarded by Justice Fields “sufficient [ly] * * * meet[s] the reasonable needs of the children and wife during the pendency of the action [citations omitted]” (O’Connor v O’Connor, 207 AD2d 334, 334 [1994]).
Sections 71 and 215 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 USC) provide that maintenance awards such as this are to be taxable to the recipient and deductible by the payor unless the court specifies otherwise or the parties, as in this case, still reside together (26 USC §§ 71, 215). Therefore, in the absence of any specification by Justice Fields as to the taxability or deductibility of her award, pursuant to section 71 of the Internal Revenue Code, the monthly maintenance of $17,000 is nontaxable and nondeductible. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Williams, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.