In re Baby Boy R. Norma Iris R.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re St. Christopher-Ottillie (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Precious Care Mgt., LLC v. Monsey Care, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- In re the Adoption of Y. (NYC Family Court 2011)
- In re Evelyse Luz S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Joseph F. v. Patricia F. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Chateau Rive Corp. v. Enclave Development Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Grisanti v. Grisanti (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the nonparty Law Guardian appeals, and the intervenors, Carmen P. and Felix P., separately appeal, from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated December 13, 2002, which denied, without a hearing, the Law Guardian’s motion to reopen the permanency proceeding.
Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
In Matter of Wesley R. (307 AD2d 360 [2003] [decided herewith]), we concluded that a new hearing as to the permanency plan for the child is warranted in light of the change of circumstances that has occurred since the date of the prior hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 1055-a. Because that is the relief requested by the appellants herein, the present appeals have been rendered academic (see Matter of Tabitha LL., 216 AD2d 651 [1995]). No exception to the mootness doctrine applies. Prudenti, P.J., Altman, Smith and Adams, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.