People v. Flemming
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Mogulescu, J., at hear
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The police had probable cause to arrest defendant because he fit the description of a person who had sold drugs to an undercover officer moments before. This description was sufficiently specific given the spatial and temporal factors and the absence of anyone else who could meet the description (see e.g. People v Williams, 281 AD2d 569 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 836 [2001]). In any event, based on this description, the police did nothing more intrusive than approach defendant, who immediately discarded a quantity of glassine envelopes. This was a voluntary act of abandonment that was not in response to any unlawful police conduct and which independently provided probable cause for defendant’s arrest. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Gonzalez, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.