Munoz v. 147 Corp.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hoffman v. Biltmore 47 Associates, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Sereda v. Sounds of Cuba, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Rosenberg & Estis, P.C. v. Bergos (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered January 7, 2003, which denied the motion of defendants 147 Corp., United Capital Corp. and Attilio F. Petrocelli to vacate plaintiffs’ note of issue, strike the answer of third-party defendant City of New York, and compel the City to produce a particular witness and respond to defendants’ supplemental demand for discovery and inspection, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to (i) vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness and strike this action from the trial calendar, (ii) order the City to respond to the supplemental demand for discovery and inspection within 30 days of service of a copy of this Court’s order, with notice of entry, and (iii) order the City to produce the firefighter(s) who removed plaintiff Munoz from the elevator on May 8, 1992 or who responded to that incident, if still employed by the City, within 60 days of service of a copy of this Court’s order, with notice of entry, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.