Ripp v. Kelly
Opinion of the Court
Determination of respondent Commissioner, dated April 26, 2002, finding petitioner guilty of specified misconduct and imposing upon petitioner a forfeiture of 20 vacation days,
Substantial evidence, including the testimony of several of petitioner’s superiors, supports respondents’ findings that petitioner was, inter alia, insubordinate and dishonest in his attempts to avoid the patrol duty assigned him (see Matter of Edwards v Safir, 282 AD2d 287 [2001]). The penalty imposed is not shocking to our sense of fairness (see Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39-40 [2001]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.