Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004

HSBC Bank USA v. 85th Estates Co.

HSBC Bank USA v. 85th Estates Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 26, 2004
4 A.D.3d 306; 771 N.Y.S.2d 665; 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1982
HSBC Bank USA v. 85th Estates Co.

Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered on or about October 4, 2002, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Banking Law § 602 provides that upon a merger, “the receiv*307ing Corporation shall be considered the same business and corporate entity as each corporation merged into it,” and become vested with all the property, rights and powers of any corporation so acquired. Further, “any reference to a merged corporation in any contract, . . . whether executed or taking effect before or after the merger, shall be considered a reference to the receiving corporation if not inconsistent with the other provisions of the contract.”

The lease in question is governed by section 602. Plaintiff became the proper legal tenant pursuant to the lease executed between defendant and plaintiffs predecessor in interest, Republic National Bank, upon the latter’s merger with plaintiff. Assuming all of its predecessor’s leasehold rights, plaintiff properly exercised the right of renewal and has thereby extended the term for a period of 22 years, from February 28, 2002.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.