Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004

Bey v. Maratea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 29, 2004

5 A.D.3d 713; 773 N.Y.S.2d 608

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Cantalupo Construction Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
Zafarani v. Gluck (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of an option to purchase real property, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated January 31, 2003, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the intervenor Olufemi Falade.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint where she failed to establish that she exercised her option to purchase the subject building from the defendant *714Mauro Maratea in accordance with the terms of the lease (see Mohring Enters. v HSBC Bank USA, 291 AD2d 385 [2002]; Willis v Ronan, 249 AD2d 299, 300 [1998]; cf. Kaplan v Lippman, 75 NY2d 320, 325 [1990]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.