Dorsa v. National Amusements
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Harper v. Al-Shaby (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Rinker v. 55 Motor Ave. Co., LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated December 20, 2002, as denied that branch of its motion which was for a protective order precluding the plaintiffs expert from testifying at trial.
Ordered that the order dated December 20, 2002, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for a protective order precluding the plaintiffs expert from testifying at trial. “[A] party is not required to serve an adverse party with notice to inspect real property that is open to the general public” (Melendez v Food Emporium, 243 AD2d 264, 264-265 [1997]; see CPLR 3120 [a] [1] [ii]). Smith, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.