Tate v. Freeport Union School District
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rakowski v. St. Aidan's Roman Catholic Church (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- CAPRETTO, SUSAN v. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Capretto v. City of Buffalo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Capretto v. City of Buffalo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Nikolakopoulos v. New York City Transit (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Nikolakopoulos v. New York City Transit (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Efstathiou v. Cuzco, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Cannizzaro v. Simco Management Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Torres v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Cuevas v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Torres v. W.J. Woodward Construction, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Abreu v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Ealey v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Morris v. Viscuso (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Government Employees Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Carter v. 73 Cranberry Street, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Freeport Union School District appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated January 16, 2003, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when she tripped and fell on a defect on a sidewalk, used as a driveway, adjacent to a parking lot reserved for faculty members of the defendant Freeport Union School District (hereinafter the School District). She commenced this action against, among others, the School District. Following the plaintiffs motion for a protective order, the School District cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it. In opposition to the cross motion, the plaintiff submitted an affidavit of her expert who concluded that the condition over which she fell was caused by the weight, speed, and impact of the cars entering the School District’s lot. Specifically, the expert concluded that the “volume” of cars entering the parking lot weakened the substructure and substrata to the point where those structures gave way, creating the depression. The expert’s affidavit was based on a review of pictures of the depression taken a few days after the plaintiff’s fall, and on deposition testimony describing the condition of the sidewalk. The Supreme Court denied the cross motion for summary judgment, finding that there were issues of fact as to whether the School District created the dangerous condition and as to whether the School District made special use of the sidewalk. We agree.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.