Gitman v. Gitman
Opinion of the Court
The award is amply supported by the record. The parties’ other liabilities were entirely marital in nature and incurred as a result of jointly made investment decisions that benefitted plaintiff as much as defendant (see Barnes v Barnes, 106 AD2d 535 [1984]; Savage v Savage, 155 AD2d 336 [1989]). No basis exists to disturb the Judicial Hearing Officer’s findings of credibility We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.