Padovani v. Miller
Opinion of the Court
In an action to
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellants’ motion pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.17 (b) (1) to compel the plaintiff to disclose copies of medical reports of medical providers who have treated or examined the plaintiff was properly denied (see generally Peterson v Wert, 134 AD2d 668 [1987]). Frudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.