Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004

People v. Mattia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 1, 2004

8 A.D.3d 299; 777 N.Y.S.2d 320; 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7475

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Prince (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
People v. Woodson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
People v. Mattia (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered November 2, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s arguments regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct during summation are largely unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the comments alleged to be inflammatory and prejudicial were, for the most part, fair comment on the evidence (see People v Ashwal, 39 *300NY2d 105 [1976]) or responsive to arguments and theories presented in the defense counsel’s summation (see People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396 [1981]). Any errors were harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The defendant was afforded the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, are without merit. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Cozier and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.