John K. v. Consilvio
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lucindo Suarez,
Respondent’s application to retain petitioner at its facility was initially granted in a prior order pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.33. A rehearing and review of that prior order is not the appropriate setting for requesting transfer from a secure to a nonsecure facility (Matter of Consilvio v Michael B., 307 AD2d 852 [2003], lv dismissed 1 NY3d 545 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 701 [2004]). Transfer of involuntary patients between such facilities is covered in 14 NYCRR part 57, which satisfies the requirements of due process in all respects (cf. Mental Hygiene Legal Servs. v Ford, 92 NY2d 500 [1998]).
We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.