People v. Wallace
Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The jury verdict finding the defendant guilty of assault in the first degree and acquitting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree is not repugnant. Viewing the verdict in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v Green, 71 NY2d 1006, 1008 [1988]; People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1, 7 [1981]), the jury could have convicted the defendant of assault based upon his participation in the attack on the complainant under an acting-in-concert theory, yet acquitted him of criminal possession of a weapon because he did not physically possess or exercise dominion or control over the knife (see People v Olcan, 143 AD2d 369 [1988]). Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.