Marren v. Marren
Opinion of the Court
The award of counsel fees was within the court’s discretion (Domestic Relations Law § 237) where defendant had engaged in obstructionist tactics forcing plaintiffs counsel to withdraw. The fees in question were for services on the motion seeking postjudgment relief, and in a prior plenary action related to child support issues (see O’Shea v O’Shea, 93 NY2d 187 [1999]; Avedon v Avedon, 270 AD2d 65 [2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 902 [2000]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.