Elegante Leasing, Ltd. v. Cross Trans Svc, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ghous v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Tarlo v. 270 Fifth St. Corp. (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2024)
- Tarlo v. 270 Fifth St. Corp. (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2024)
- Postiglione v. Sacks & Sacks, LLP (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Oppedisano v. D'Agostino (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Duberry v. CNM Analytics, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Jeffrey Gardens Apt. Corp. v. LH Mgt., Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Taub v. Schon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- New York Community Bank v. Campbell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Taub v. Schon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Taub v. Schon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Martin v. Lancer Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Martin v. Lancer Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Allstate ATM Corp. v. E.S.A. Holding Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Nimkoff Rosenfeld & Schechter, LLP v. O'Flaherty (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Mendrzycki v. Cricchio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Weber v. Goss (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Williams v. Feig (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover sums alleged to be due under an automobile lease, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), dated October 16, 2003, as denied their motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff commenced this action to recover sums allegedly owed by the defendants in connection with an auto lease. After the defendants moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7), the plaintiff cross-moved for leave to amend the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3025. The court denied the motion and granted the cross motion. The defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the order as denied their motion. Because the original complaint was superseded by the amended complaint, the defendants’ challenge to the original complaint has been rendered academic,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.