People v. Dozier
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Charles T. Maloy, J.), rendered March 26, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [3]). We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying his motion to withdraw the plea without a hearing. “Only in the rare instance will a defendant be entitled to an evidentiary hearing; often a limited interrogation by the court will suffice. The defendant should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his contentions and the court should be enabled to make an informed determination” (People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927 [1974]; see People v
Moreover, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion (see People v Alexander, 97 NY2d 482, 485 [2002]; People v Rankin, 303 AD2d 990 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 565 [2003]). “Defendant’s belated claims of . . . innocence are unsupported by the record, which shows that defendant knowingly and voluntarily made a complete and detailed statement concerning his commission of the crime” (Witcher, 222 AD2d at 1016). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.