Matrix Financial Services Corp. v. McKiernan
Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion to vacate the foreclosure sale. The appellant failed to establish that “a substantial right of a party was prejudiced” by the trivial irregularities in the notice of sale (RPAPL 231 [6]; see Citibank v Glen Cove Servicing Corp., 265 AD2d 520 [1999]; Marine Midland Bank v Trennes, 250 AD2d 653 [1998]; Amresco New England II v Denino, 283 AD2d 599 [2001]).
The appellant’s remaining contention does not warrant reversal. Smith, J.P, Luciano, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.