O'Brien v. Triburough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
Opinion of the Court
Inasmuch as the record shows that plaintiff sustained the complained-of injury when his wrist became stuck against an iron beam, i.e., in an accident in which elevation differentials played no significant role, and not as a result of his subsequent fall from his work position onto safety netting, summary judgment dismissing his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim should have been granted (see Narducci v Manhasset Bay Assoc., 96 NY2d 259, 269 [2001]). Summary judgment should have been granted as well dismissing plaintiffs Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims since the record is devoid of evidence that defendant exercised any direct control over the injury-producing work (see Rizzuto v L.A. Wenger Contr. Co., 91 NY2d 343, 352 [1998]).
The motion court, however, properly found triable issues as to whether defendant permitted the wooden block upon which plaintiff was working to become slippery in violation of 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (d) with resultant injury to plaintiff, thus precluding dismissal of the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim. Concur— Buckley, EJ., Tom, Andrias, Friedman and Sullivan, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.