People v. Grant
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defen
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support convictions of depraved indifference murder (see Penal Law § 125.25 [2]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266 [2004]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (see Penal Law § 265.02 [1]), is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; People v Gibbons, 15 AD3d 196 [2005]; People v Gutierrez, 15 AD3d 502 [2005]), and we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]; [6] [a]; People v Gutierrez, supra).
Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Martin, 8 AD3d 883 [2004]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.