People v. Miller
Opinion of the Court
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). It is undisputed that the police had probable cause to arrest defendant based on their observation that he had removed drugs from one of his bags and passed them to another person. When defendant, after being arrested, asked the police to permit two civilians to take his bags, the police properly inspected the bags for their own safety and to prevent any possible loss or destruction of evidence (see People v Wylie, 244 AD2d 247 [1997] lv denied 91 NY2d 946 [1998]), resulting in the discovery of drugs. The record also supports the court’s finding that money was recovered from defendant pursuant to his lawful arrest.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
The contentions raised in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief are forfeited by the guilty plea and unavailing in any event. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Ellerin, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.