Smilen v. William Penn Life Insurance
Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied a motion for class certification because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that questions of fact common to the class predominate over questions affecting only individual members (see CPLR 901; DeFilippo v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 13 AD3d 178 [2004]; Gaidon v Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 2 AD3d 130 [2003]). Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.