People v. Harrison
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- ECHEVARRIA, CARMELO, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- People v. Echevarria (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- People v. Echevarria (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- People v. Harrison (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the court improperly marshaled evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bacchus, 183 AD2d 720 [1992]; People v McDonald, 144 AD2d 701, 702 [1988]), and in any event, is without merit (see CPL 300.10 [2]; People v Turton, 221 AD2d 671 [1995]; People v Montana, 192 AD2d 623 [1993]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court marshaled the evidence in an evenhanded manner and did not give undue emphasis to the People’s contentions (see People v O’Neal, 12 AD3d 620, 621 [2004]). The court emphasized that identification must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, instructed the jury that its recollection of the evidence was controlling, and reminded the jury that it was the exclusive judge of credibility (see People v Snyder, 294 AD2d 381, 382 [2002]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.