Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005

George S. May International Co. v. Thirsty Moose, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 2, 2005 · Kane

19 A.D.3d 721; 796 N.Y.S.2d 196; 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8492

Cases that cite this one

25 later published cases cite this decision.

Navillus Tile, Inc. v. CNY Construction 701 LLC (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 2023)
Digesare Mech., Inc. v. U.W. Marx, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
SCE Envtl. Group, Inc. v. Murnane Bldg. Contrs., Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
Iken v. Bohemian Brethren Presbyt. Church (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
iQuanti, Inc. v. RTW Retailwinds Acquistion LLC (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
O'Keefe v. Barra (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
Radiation Oncology Servs. of Cent. N.Y., P.C. v. Our Lady of Lourdes Mem. Hosp., Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
Ironwoods Troy, LLC v. Optigolf Troy, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
Connors v. Jannuzzo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
Federal Corporation v. Future Tire Company, Ltd. (District Court, E.D. New York 2021)
GRJH, Inc. v. 3680 Props., Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
Chianis & Anderson Architects, PLLC v. Courterback Development Company, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
Seton Health at Schuyler Ridge Residential Health Care v. Dziuba (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
Route 217, LLC v. Greer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Route 217, LLC v. Greer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Wysong v. Farm Family Casualty Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
Wysong v. Farm Family Casualty Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna, LLP v. Oppitz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna, LLP v. Oppitz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
Education Plus, Inc. v. Glasser (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
Education Plus, Inc. v. Glasser (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
Yellow Book Sales & Distribution Co. v. Mantini (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
Lodge-Stewart v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
Clifford R. Gray, Inc. v. LeChase Construction Services, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
J.B.H., Inc. v. Godinez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Kane, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Dawson, J.), entered April 21, 2004 in Essex County, which, inter alia, partially granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff, a management consulting services firm, commenced this action for breach of contract, account stated and unjust *722enrichment to recover moneys allegedly owed by defendant for services that plaintiff rendered to it. Defendant subsequently moved for an order compelling certain discovery and plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment on the complaint. At issue on appeal is an order of Supreme Court which, as is relevant here, granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on its breach of contract and account stated causes of action.

We affirm. In support of its cross motion, plaintiff produced the parties’ signed written contract along with various invoices which reflect that defendant failed to pay for services that plaintiff provided. This evidence was sufficient to establish a prima facie case for breach of contract (see Hussey v Leggio Agency, 299 AD2d 690, 691 [2002]; Convenient Med. Care v Medical Bus. Assoc., 291 AD2d 617, 618 [2002]). Plaintiff also established a prima facie case for an account stated in that the invoices it produced were signed and accepted by defendant’s president without objection and there is proof that defendant remitted a partial payment to plaintiff (see Hussey v Leggio Agency, supra at 691; Sandvoss v Dunkelberger, 112 AD2d 278, 279 [1985]). Defendant’s general denials and conclusory allegations in opposition to plaintiffs cross motion failed to establish the existence of a triable issue of fact with respect to either of plaintiffs claims (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Jovee Contr. Corp. v AIA Envtl. Corp., 283 AD2d 398, 400 [2001]). Defendant’s argument regarding the need for further disclosure (see CPLR 3212 [f]) is unpersuasive, as such disclosure would not contradict plaintiffs proof and is only relevant to defendant’s .counterclaim, which was severed and is still progressing. Under these circumstances, we conclude that plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment with respect to its breach of contract and account stated causes of action was properly granted.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.