Honzawa v. Hiro Enterprises USA, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Paula J. Omansky, J.), entered May 13, 2004, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law §§ 1104 and 1104-a to dissolve respondent corporations, granted respondents’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the petition, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Petitioner, whose prior dissolution proceeding was dismissed on the basis of his admission that he was not a shareholder of record of any of the subject corporations (Honzawa Holding Co. v Hiro Enter. USA, 291 AD2d 318 [2002]), now claims entitlement to such relief as a shareholder of the subject corporations’ Japanese parent companies.
The motion court correctly found that during years of complex litigation in Japan, the litigants had ample notice and opportunity to be heard. Petitioner’s ownership claims were, following these years of litigation, clearly rejected by the Japanese Supreme Court.
Petitioner’s claim in this litigation is precluded by the doctrine of comity because a Japanese court of last resort ruled that petitioner is not such a shareholder (see Matter of Gotlib v Ratsutsky, 83 NY2d 696, 699-700 [1994]; Greschler v Greschler, 51 NY2d 368, 376 [1980]). We reject petitioner’s argument that
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.