Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005

Agramonte v. Marvin

Agramonte v. Marvin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 13, 2005
22 A.D.3d 322; 802 N.Y.S.2d 420
Agramonte v. Marvin

Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered July 9, 2004, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to plaintiffs-appellants on the ground that they did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs received physical therapy for three months after the accident but sought no other treatment until two years later, shortly after defendants made the first of their motions for summary judgment. This unexplained gap in treatment is fatal to plaintiffs’ claims of serious injury (Pommells v Perez, 4 NY3d 566, 574 [2005]; Colon v Kempner, 20 AD3d 372, 374 [2005]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.