Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005

In re Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 27, 2005
22 A.D.3d 1029; 802 N.Y.S.2d 386
In re Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1987, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (273 AD2d 600 [2000]).

*1030Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.