Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 16, 2005
19 A.D.3d 866; 796 N.Y.S.2d 560
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Respondent, was admitted to practice by this Court in 1992, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration require- ments of Judiciary Law § 468-a (262 AD2d 702 [1999]).

Respondent nowrequests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s applicationis granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately. Cardona, PJ.,

Cardona, PJ.,Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is fur- ther ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.