Schroeder v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the petitioners’ contention, there was no material alteration with respect to the total number of signatures witnessed on sheet 12 of the designating petition. Rather, the alleged alteration to that portion of sheet 12 was an overwriting which did not change what was originally written (see Matter of McShane v Coveney, 37 NY2d 789, 791 [1975]; cf. Matter of Jonas v Velez, 65 NY2d 954, 955 [1985]). Moreover, there is no evidence as to significant differences of times or circumstances of the writing (see Matter of McShane v Coveney, supra).
The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Cozier, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.