Balleta v. 35 Park Avenue Corp.
Opinion of the Court
There was no evidence that defendant owner 35 Park Avenue had notice of the alleged hazard, a wet area in the vestibule of its premises. Moreover, as an out-of-possession landlord, 35 Park Avenue was not, even with a right of reentry, responsible for remediating the nonstructural hazard at issue (see McDonald v Riverbay Corp., 308 AD2d 345, 346 [2003]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.