In re Geraldine P.
Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.60 to authorize continued assisted outpatient treatment, Geraldine E appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The order and judgment expired by its own terms in August 2005. Accordingly, this appeal is academic, and the issue raised is not sufficiently substantial or novel to warrant invoking an exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of David C., 69 NY2d 796, 798 [1987]; Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713-715 [1980]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.