People v. Laws
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hernandez v. Conway (District Court, W.D. New York 2007)
- People v. Britton (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- MORMAN, JESSE, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Morman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Morman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- SMITH, KEITH A., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- People v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- People v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- ANDERSON, CLIFFORD C., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- GRAHAM, ORADO N., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Graham (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Graham (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Anderson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Anderson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Slater (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- People v. Ray (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- People v. Barry (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), rendered February 13, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a juiy verdict, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree (two counts) and unlawful possession of marihuana.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of, inter alia, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) arising from his constructive possession of cocaine found in a house. Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in permitting the People to present circumstantial evidence that he had been involved in prior drug transactions in order to establish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.