Martinez v. Jesionowska
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered October 13, 2005, which denied the motion by defendant Frederic Harris, M.D. and the cross motion by defendants Jesionowska, Mentus and Beth Israel Medical Center to dismiss the action as abandoned, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
It is uncontested that this case, originally commenced in
A motion to dismiss an action as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3404 may be properly made only with respect to cases on the trial calendar (Johnson v Minskoff & Sons, 287 AD2d 233 [2001]). Thus, this action could not have been dismissed under CPLR 3404 because it was not on the trial calendar in New York County. Furthermore, we note that defendants never filed a 90-day notice for dismissal for want of prosecution pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b) (3) (see Carino Italian Style v Shammah, 266 AD2d 1 [1999]). We do not condone the extensive period of inactivity in this action, but CPLR 3404 is not the appropriate device to address that failing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Marlow, Sullivan and Catterson, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.