Panish v. Panish
Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust upon certain real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court did not err in staying a proceeding commenced by the defendant to evict the plaintiff from certain real property pending resolution of this action to impose a constructive trust upon the property (see Whitmarsh v Farnell, 298 NY 336, 344 [1949]; Reynolds v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal, 199 AD2d 15 [1993]; Matter of MacLeod v Shapiro, 20 AD2d 424 [1964]; 3 Dolan, Rasch’s New York Landlord and Tenant-Summary Proceedings § 46:7 [4th ed]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.