In re the Claim of Limoncelli
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 27, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
We affirm. An employee’s failure to follow an employer’s reasonable policy which, in turn, has a detrimental effect upon the employer’s interest has been found to constitute disqualifying misconduct (see Matter of Ochs [Commissioner of Labor], 21 AD3d 1196, 1197 [2005]; Matter of Ghoulian [Commissioner of Labor], 6 AD3d 908, 908 [2004]). Here, the purpose of the employer’s policy was to ensure that food was served at the proper temperature in accordance with health regulations. It is undisputed that claimant knew of the policy and disregarded it on the date in question. Although testimony was presented at the administrative hearing concerning prior warnings that claimant had received about her work performance, the record does not substantiate her claim that documentation regarding the same was admitted into evidence. Notably, claimant was not precluded from cross-examining the witness who gave such testimony. Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Feters, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.