Wan v. Goord
Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Following a fight in the laundry room, correction officers received confidential information in the form of anonymous notes which indicated that petitioner, a laundry porter, possessed a weapon and was making homemade alcohol. They searched the laundry room and found a metal shank wrapped in
Upon our review, “[t]he misbehavior report, testimony at the hearing and supporting documents, together with the circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt” (Matter of Gourdine v Goord, 18 AD3d 1045, 1045-1046 [2005]). While petitioner contends that the Hearing Officer did not ascertain the reliability of the confidential sources, we note that the information they disclosed prompted the investigation and search but did not provide the basis for the determination of guilt (see Matter of Hemphill v Selsky, 26 AD3d 548, 549 [2006]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review.
Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.