Korn v. Korn
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County
The complaint’s allegations, even as supplemented by plaintiff’s affidavits, do not make out a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress (see e.g. Lewittes v Blume, 18 AD3d 261 [2005]). While it is unnecessary to reach defendant’s alternative argument for affirmance, i.e., that the complaint was not timely served, we note that plaintiffs attorney has made a showing of “good cause” for extending the time for service pursuant to CPLR 306-b. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Saxe, Marlow, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.