In re Michael D.
Opinion of the Court
Order of disposi
The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determination regarding credibility. Appellant’s course of conduct before, during and after the robbery, including his interference with the victim’s son-in-law’s efforts to recover the stolen purse, supported the conclusion that he was a participant in the crime (see e.g. Matter of Donald J., 25 AD3d 381 [2006]). Concur—Andrias, J.E, Nardelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.