Bridget M. v. Billick
Opinion of the Court
Defendant, a psychiatrist appointed by the court as the neutral forensic evaluator with the consent of the parties’ attorneys and the children’s Law Guardian in an underlying custody proceeding in Family Court (see Matter of John A. v Bridget M., 16 AD3d 324 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]), has judicial immunity from suit for malpractice regarding the work he performed (see Colombo v Schwartz, 15 AD3d 522 [2005]; Deed v Condrell, 150 Misc 2d 279 [1991], affd 177 AD2d 1055 [1991]). Plaintiffs have failed to show any exception that would warrant lifting the immunity. Concur — Gonzalez, J.P., Sweeny, McGuire, Malone and Kavanagh, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.