New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Medalliance Medical Health Services v. Allstate Insurance (Civil Court of the City of New York 2013)
- Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center v. Allstate Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Westchester Medical Center v. Progressive Casualty Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Westchester Medical Center v. Safeco Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Hospital for Joint Diseases v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Westchester Medical Center v. Countrywide Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Westchester Medical Center v. Progressive Casualty Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover no-fault medical payments under contracts of insurance, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 29, 2006, which, upon an order of the same court (Brennan, J.) dated March 13, 2006, granting the motion of the plaintiff Mount Sinai Hospital, as assignee of Salvatore Gigante, for summary judgment on the third cause of action, is in favor of that plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $30,092.49. The defendant’s notice of appeal from the order is deemed to be a notice of appeal from the judgment.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
In support of its motion for summary judgment on the third cause of action, the plaintiff Mount Sinai Hospital, as assignee of Salvatore Gigante (hereinafter Mount Sinai), demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by
The defendant’s remaining contention is improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see Rotundo v S & C Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 255 AD2d 573 [1998]) and, in any event, is without merit (see General Construction Law § 46; William Iselin & Co. v Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 117 AD2d 86, 90 [1986], mod 69 NY2d 908 [1987]). Mastro, J.E, Goldstein, Lifson and Garni, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.