Tekeste B.-M. v. Zeineba H.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kaleta v. Kaleta (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Matter of Emily F. v. Victor P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Matter of McMiller v. Frank (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Matter of Weekes v. Martin-Weekes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Edwards v. Ferris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- BAXTER, COREY L. v. BORDEN, LEAH P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Samantha J.M. v. Anthony T.C. (NYC Family Court 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (John F. Batt, J.), entered May 12, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order modified the judgment of divorce.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the provision transferring custody of the children to petitioner in the event respondent fails to return to Erie County with the children by a date certain and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner father commenced this proceeding alleging that respondent mother had moved to Iowa with the children, without notice to petitioner, and seeking to enforce the judgment of divorce pursuant to which respondent was awarded sole custody of the children, with weekly visitation to petitioner. Following a hearing, wherein respondent was represented by counsel but did not personally appear, Family Court ordered respondent to return to Erie County with the children by a date certain. We conclude that the court erred in further ordering that respondent’s failure to comply would result in a transfer of custody to petitioner. Petitioner did not seek a change of custody (cf. Matter of Tyrone W. v Dawn M.P., 27 AD3d 1147 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 705 [2006]), and there was no evidence presented at the hearing on the issue whether an award of custody to petitioner is in the best interests of the children (see Labanowski v Labanowski, 4 AD3d 690, 695 [2004]; cf. Matter of
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.