People v. Jenkins
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme
Defendant’s argument that, in making its probable cause determination, the hearing court improperly relied on the minutes of an ex parte, in camera proceeding conducted pursuant to People v Darden (34 NY2d 177 [1974]) is unpreserved (see People v Tutt, 38 NY2d 1011 [1976]; see also People v Kello, 96 NY2d 740, 743-744 [2001]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur—Friedman, J.E, Nardelli, Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.