Whyte v. Horn
Opinion of the Court
Determination of respondent Commissioner, dated November 22, 2005, terminating petitioner’s employment as a correction officer,
The substantial evidence issue raised in the petition has since been abandoned, and petitioner now presses only claims that the administrative hearing resulting in the challenged determination was procedurally flawed. Although we nonetheless retain the matter in the interests of judicial economy (see Matter of Sylvester v Goord, 24 AD3d 841 [2005]), petitioner’s procedural arguments are unpreserved and would not, even if they could be reached (see Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Health, 96 NY2d 879 [2001]), warrant annulment of respondent’s determination. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Friedman, Buckley, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.