People v. Adames
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme
We perceive no basis for reducing defendant’s term of postrelease supervision. For the reasons stated in our decision in People v Lemos (34 AD3d 343 [2006]), we reject defendant’s argument that the court unlawfully imposed a mandatory surcharge and fees when it did so in writing, without including the surcharge and fees in its oral pronouncement of sentence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.